IREM Certified Property Manager (CPM) Practice Test

Question: 1 / 400

What was the key ruling in Washington v. Davis regarding the legality of tests with adverse impacts?

The test is illegal regardless of its job relevance

The test is legal if it is job-related

The key ruling in Washington v. Davis established that a test is legally permissible if it is determined to be job-related and necessary for the performance of the job in question. This case involved the use of a civil service test for police officer candidates that disproportionately affected minority applicants. The ruling clarified that adverse impact alone does not render a test illegal; rather, it is essential to demonstrate that the test is relevant to the position and is a valid measure of the skills or abilities required for successful job performance. This distinction is fundamental in employment law, emphasizing that employment tests can be used as long as they effectively measure the qualifications necessary for the job while also considering potential adverse impacts.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

The test must be impartial to be considered legal

The test is legal only if approved by the federal government

Next Question

Report this question

Download IREM Certified Property Manager (CPM) Practice Test PDF Study Guide
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy